New Mexico State DirectHits Ignition Test

NEW MEXICO STATE HIGHWAY
AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
 
April 5, 1993  
Mr. Lou Camilli
COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY
DirectHits Division
4255 Balloon Park Road, NE
Albuquerque, NM 87109
 
Dear Mr. Camilli:
 
In response to your company's offer of December 1992, the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department agreed to test DirectHits Ignition devices on a group of ten to fifteen State of New Mexico Vehicles. We also agreed to share the results of our findings and observations with your company.
 
The installation of these devices was accomplished on all vehicles in "as is" condition with no allowance for adjustments or modifications that could create possible enhancement of the test results.
 
Overall, the test group of thirteen vehicles produced more positive than negative results in fuel economy and/or increased power and driveability. The attached report reflects tests results of individual documented fuel economy and performance comments. Two vehicles were withdrawn during the course of testing due to engine or other problems unrelated to DirectHits Ignition. It is probably fair to assume that fine tuning or minor modifications in most instances would tend to produce better results.
 
This will conclude the initial phase of our testing. This information will be provided to other personnel in the Department as well as other interested agencies for comments and decisions concerning your product.
 
Sincerely,
 
Richard A. Leonard signature
Richard A. Leonard
Equipment Section
Engineering Operations Division
 
RAL: ra
Attachment
pc: George Baca
Ted Herrera
Mary Ford, Energy " Minerals Department
Art Armijo, General Services Department

 


New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department
DirectHits Ignition Test

NOTE: Tests were conducted with no modifictions to engines other than installtion of DirectHits Ignition Devices. If allowance had be made for tuning the engines to the product, noted power increases would have been converted into fuel economy
Vehicle MPG MPG %
Make Model Fuel Year Engine Before After Increase Remarks
Chev Caprice
Wagon
ULR 1989 5.0 Liter V-8 20.0 22.0 10.00% 170,000 Miles on unit at beginning of test
No Noticeable Power Increase. Radio
Interference problems. (Correctable)
GMC Pickup ULR 1990 5.7 Liter V-8 27.0 20.0 17.65% Power increase noted.
Dodge D-350 ULR 1989 5.9 Liter V-8 10.0 14.0 40.00% Power increase noted.
Chev C-50 ULR 1987 7.0 Liter V-8 -- -- -- Installation scheduling conflict - unit withdrawn.
Dodge D-150
Pickup
CNG
ULR
1990 5.2 Liter V8 -- -- -- Initail signs of power and fuel economy increase.
Problems with CNG conversion installation has
prevented collection of accurate data. Unit
withdrawn.
Chev C-30 ULR 1986 5.7 Liter V-8 11.0 11.0 0.00% Significant power increase noted - Vehicle severely
underpowered for weight of unit.
Chev Caprice ULR 1989 5.0 Liter V-8 24.0 22.8 -0.05% Time and distance constraints prevented close
monitoring to determine cause of problems, which
may or may not have been DirectHits related. Radio
interference also noted. (Correctable)
Chev Corsica ULR 1990 3.1 Liter V-8 32.0 32.0 0.00% Power increase noted.
Chev Corsica ULR 1990 3.1 Liter V-8 24.0 28.0 16.67% Power increase noted, unit had engine problems not
associated with DirectHits
Dodge D-150
Pickup
ULR 1990 5.2 Liter V-8 16.0 20.0 25.00% Significant power increase noted.
Ford F-150
Pickup
ULR 1988 5.7 Liter V-8 15.0 15.0 0.00% No Change.
Chev C-50 ULR 1987 7.0 Liter V-8 -- -- -- Installation scheduling conflict - unit withdrawn.
Jeep Cherokee ULR 1987 4.0 Liter L-6 14.0 16.5 17.88% Power increase noted.
Ford F-150
Pickup
ULR 1990 4.9 Liter L-6 14.0 16.0 14.29% Significant power increase noted.
  12.85% Average Fuel economy increases over 11 Vehicles